Segment
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV Upper-middle2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV vs. Fulda Kristall Control HP2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Fulda (55%). In this particular case, the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 has a better rating of 76% compared to 45% of the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2017 215/65 R16 test, where both the G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV and the Kristall Control HP2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (60%) of the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 also have B wet ratings.
| # | BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV | Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R15 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Exemplary2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV Satisfactory2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 |
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 2,6 | 1,9 | 2,5 | 3,2 | 1,5 | 1,5 |
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,5 | 2,4 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 3,3 | 1,5 | 1,6 |
| Show test details | |||||||