Segment
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV Upper-middle2. Firestone Destination Winter Upper-middle
Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV vs. Firestone Destination Winter
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from USA. BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Firestone (65%). But when it comes to comparing BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV and Firestone Destination Winter, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2017 215/65 R16 test, where both the G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV and the Destination Winter were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Firestone Destination Winter also have B wet ratings.
| # | BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV
| Firestone Destination Winter
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R15 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV Satisfactory2. Firestone Destination Winter Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV Satisfactory2. Firestone Destination Winter Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 |
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,6 | 2,6 | 1,9 | 2,5 | 3,2 | 1,5 | 1,5 |
| Firestone Destination Winter Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3,5 | 3,2 | 2,8 | 2,5 | 3,6 | 2,0 | 1,9 |
| Show test details | ||||||||
