Segment
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV Upper-middle2. Apollo Apterra Winter Lowcost
Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV vs. Apollo Apterra Winter
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Apollo (71%). But when it comes to comparing BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV and Apollo Apterra Winter, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2017 215/65 R16 test, where both the G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV and the Apterra Winter were tested.
| # | BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV
| Apollo Apterra Winter
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R20 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Apollo Apterra Winter Satisfactory2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Apollo Apterra Winter Satisfactory2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 |
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,6 | 2,6 | 1,9 | 2,5 | 3,2 | 1,5 | 1,5 |
| Apollo Apterra Winter Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3,1 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 2,5 | 3,8 | 2,0 | 2,7 |
| Show test details | ||||||||
