Segment
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Premium2. BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than BFGoodrich (75%). But when it comes to comparing BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER and Michelin AGILIS ALPIN, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Michelin AGILIS ALPIN first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the ACTIVAN WINTER and the AGILIS ALPIN were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Michelin AGILIS ALPIN also have B wet ratings.
# | BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
| Michelin AGILIS ALPIN
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R16 | R15 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Premium2. BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER Upper-middle
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Recommended
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Still recommended
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | doporučeno | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER Rating: Not recommended | nedoporučeno | 4,9 | 3,4 | 3,1 | 2,3 | 3,3 | 2,0 | 1,7 |
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Rating: Recommended | doporučeno | 2,9 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 2,4 | 3,2 | 2,0 | 2,0 |
Show test details |