• 14 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than BFGoodrich (75%). But when it comes to comparing BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER and Michelin AGILIS ALPIN, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Michelin AGILIS ALPIN first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the ACTIVAN WINTER and the AGILIS ALPIN were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Michelin AGILIS ALPIN also have B wet ratings.

# BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
/0%
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN
/0%

Add to comparison

BFGoodrich
Michelin
DimensionsR14 - R16 R15 - R17
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

ADAC
Name RatingWetDrySnowIceNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in testdoporučeno2,42,32,22,32,52,01,6
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
Rating: Not recommended
nedoporučeno4,93,43,12,3 3,32,0 1,7
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN
Rating: Recommended
doporučeno 2,93,42,52,43,22,0 2,0
Show test details