Segment
1. BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER Upper-middle2. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Matador (38%). But when it comes to comparing BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER and Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the ACTIVAN WINTER and the MPS530 Sibir Snow Van were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van has C rating.
# | BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
| Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R16 | R14 - R16 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER Upper-middle2. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Lowcost
1. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Conditionally recommended
1. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Conditionally recommended
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | doporučeno | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER Rating: Not recommended | nedoporučeno | 4,9 | 3,4 | 3,1 | 2,3 | 3,3 | 2,0 | 1,7 |
Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 3,2 | 4,1 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 3,8 | 3,0 | 2,6 |
Show test details |