Segment
2. BF Goodrich g-force Winter Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BF) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than BF (75%). The first tyre test of BF Goodrich g-force Winter was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the Goodrich g-force Winter and the Winter i*cept RS2 W452 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | BF Goodrich g-force Winter
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R13 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. BF Goodrich g-force Winter Upper-middle
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
BF Goodrich g-force Winter | 32 | 24,2 | |||||
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 32 | 24,9 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | Příkladné | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | ||
BF Goodrich g-force Winter Rating: - | Podmíněně doporučeno | 3 | 2- | 2 | 1- | ||
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: - | Dobré | 2- | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
BF Goodrich g-force Winter | 39,4 | 26,8 | |||||
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 39,1 | 26,2 | |||||
Show test details |