Segment
1. BF Goodrich g-force Winter Upper-middle2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from USA. Generally, BF winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Firestone (65%). But when it comes to comparing BF Goodrich g-force Winter and Firestone Winterhawk 3, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the Goodrich g-force Winter and the Winterhawk 3 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | BF Goodrich g-force Winter
| Firestone Winterhawk 3
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R13 - R18 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. BF Goodrich g-force Winter Upper-middle2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
BF Goodrich g-force Winter | 32 | 24,2 | |||||
Firestone Winterhawk 3 | 34,3 | 25,5 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
BF Goodrich g-force Winter | 39,4 | 26,8 | |||||
Firestone Winterhawk 3 | 39,8 | 27,5 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,3 | 2,1 | 1,7 | 2,0 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,5 |
BF Goodrich g-force Winter Rating: - | 3,9 | 2,6 | 2,2 | 2,2 | 3,6 | 1,5 | 1,8 |
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: - | 3,0 | 2,9 | 2,4 | 2,0 | 2,8 | 2,0 | 2,2 |
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
BF Goodrich g-force Winter | 42,9 | 28,8 | |||||
Firestone Winterhawk 3 | 41,9 | 28,9 | |||||
Show test details |