Segment
1. BF Goodrich g-force Winter Upper-middle2. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BF) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Czech Republic (Barum). Barum is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, BF winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Barum (61%). But when it comes to comparing BF Goodrich g-force Winter and Barum Polaris 3, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the Goodrich g-force Winter and the Polaris 3 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | BF Goodrich g-force Winter
| Barum Polaris 3
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R13 - R18 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. BF Goodrich g-force Winter Upper-middle2. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost
1. Barum Polaris 3 10.6
1. Barum Polaris 3 Exemplary
1. Barum Polaris 3 Satisfactory
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | Příkladné | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | ||
BF Goodrich g-force Winter Rating: - | Podmíněně doporučeno | 3 | 2- | 2 | 1- | ||
Barum Polaris 3 Rating: - | Dostatečné | 2 | 3+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
BF Goodrich g-force Winter | 39,4 | 26,8 | |||||
Barum Polaris 3 | 37,2 | 26,1 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
BF Goodrich g-force Winter | 42,9 | 28,8 | |||||
Barum Polaris 3 | 40,8 | 28,6 | |||||
Show test details |