Segment
1. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost
Comparison: Barum Polaris 3 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Czech Republic (Barum) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador). Barum is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Barum winter tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Matador (38%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the Polaris 3 and the MP92 Sibir Snow were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Barum Polaris 3 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Matador MP92 Sibir Snow also have C wet ratings.
| # | Barum Polaris 3
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R15 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Barum Polaris 3 10.6
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Barum Polaris 3 Exemplary2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Barum Polaris 3 Satisfactory2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | ||
| Barum Polaris 3 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3+ | 2- | 2+ | 2- | ||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3+ | 2- | 2- | 2- | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 3 | 36,7 | 27,8 | |||||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 36,6 | 28,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 3 | 35,8 | 27,6 | |||||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 38,4 | - | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 3 | 37,2 | 26,1 | |||||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 40,6 | 26,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 3 | 40,8 | 28,6 | |||||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 43,1 | 28,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
