Segment
2. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Czech Republic (Barum) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Barum is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than Barum (61%). The first tyre test of Barum Polaris 3 was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Continental WinterContact TS 860 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the Polaris 3 and the WinterContact TS 860 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Barum Polaris 3 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Continental WinterContact TS 860 has B rating.
# | Barum Polaris 3
| Continental WinterContact TS 860
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R13 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost
2. Barum Polaris 3 10.6
1. Barum Polaris 3 Exemplary2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Very good
2. Barum Polaris 3 Satisfactory
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | ||
Barum Polaris 3 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3+ | 2- | 2+ | 2- | ||
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 1- | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
Barum Polaris 3 | 36,7 | 27,8 | |||||
Continental WinterContact TS 860 | 34,5 | 27,6 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | příkladné | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | ||
Barum Polaris 3 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3+ | 2 | 1- | 2+ | ||
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2- | ||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
Barum Polaris 3 | 35,8 | 27,6 | |||||
Continental WinterContact TS 860 | 33,5 | 27,5 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | Příkladné | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | ||
Barum Polaris 3 Rating: - | Dostatečné | 2 | 3+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: - | Příkladné | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | ||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
Barum Polaris 3 | 37,2 | 26,1 | |||||
Continental WinterContact TS 860 | 34,2 | 25,6 | |||||
Show test details |