Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium2. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost
Comparison: Barum Polaris 3 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Czech Republic (Barum) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Barum is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Barum (61%). But when it comes to comparing Barum Polaris 3 and Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the Polaris 3 and the Blizzak LM-001 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Barum Polaris 3 has C wet grip rating, whereas 70% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 has B rating.
| # | Barum Polaris 3
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R14 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Barum Polaris 3 10.6
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Barum Polaris 3 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
2. Barum Polaris 3 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | ||
| Barum Polaris 3 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3+ | 2 | 1- | 2+ | ||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good | dobré | 1- | 2- | 2 | 2+ | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 3 | 35,8 | 27,6 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 32,5 | 28,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | Příkladné | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | ||
| Barum Polaris 3 Rating: - | Dostatečné | 2 | 3+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: - | Dostatečné | 2 | 3+ | 2+ | 1- | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 3 | 37,2 | 26,1 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 38,5 | 25,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | Dobré | 1,8 | 1,9 | 1,7 | 2,2 | 2,8 | 1 | 1,5 |
| Barum Polaris 3 Rating: - | Uspokojivé | 3,4 | 2,2 | 2,1 | 2,8 | 3,6 | 1,5 | 2,0 |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: - | Uspokojivé | 2,8 | 2,6 | 1,9 | 2,9 | 3,6 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | ||||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 3 | 40,8 | 28,6 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 43,4 | 28,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 1 | ||
| Barum Polaris 3 Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 2- | 2 | 2+ | 2- | ||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: - | Doporučitelné | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 1- | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
