Comparison: Barum Polaris 3 4x4 vs. Sava Eskimo HP2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Czech Republic (Barum) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava). Barum is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Sava winter tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Barum (61%). Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2017 215/65 R16 test, where both the Polaris 3 4x4 and the Eskimo HP2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Barum Polaris 3 4x4 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (59%) of the Sava Eskimo HP2 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Barum Polaris 3 4x4
| Sava Eskimo HP2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R15 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry driving behavior
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel efficiency
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Ice braking
Ice lateral guidance
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 |
| Barum Polaris 3 4x4 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,8 | 2,4 | 2,8 | 3,5 | 2,5 | 2,5 |
| Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,4 | 2,5 | 2,3 | 3,6 | 1,5 | 1,7 |
| Show test details | |||||||
