Segment
1. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle2. Barum Polaris 3 4x4 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Czech Republic (Barum) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Barum is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Barum winter tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Nokian (52%). But when it comes to comparing Barum Polaris 3 4x4 and Nokian WR D4, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Barum Polaris 3 4x4 was done in 2017, compared to 2015 when was the Nokian WR D4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2017 215/65 R16 test, where both the Polaris 3 4x4 and the WR D4 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Barum Polaris 3 4x4 has C wet grip rating, whereas 97% of Nokian WR D4 has B rating.
# | Barum Polaris 3 4x4
| Nokian WR D4
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R13 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle2. Barum Polaris 3 4x4 Lowcost
2. Nokian WR D4 14.
1. Nokian WR D4 6.04
1. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended2. Barum Polaris 3 4x4 Satisfactory
1. Nokian WR D4 Recommended2. Barum Polaris 3 4x4 Satisfactory
1. Nokian WR D4 81%
2. Nokian WR D4 72%
1. Nokian WR D4 91%
1. Nokian WR D4 89%
1. Nokian WR D4 91%
1. Nokian WR D4 69%
2. Nokian WR D4 69%
1. Nokian WR D4 86%
1. Nokian WR D4 67%
1. Nokian WR D4 85%
1. Nokian WR D4 82%
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | dobré | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 |
Barum Polaris 3 4x4 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3,1 | 2,8 | 2,4 | 2,8 | 3,5 | 2,5 | 2,5 |
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,6 | 2,5 | 1,9 | 2,5 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
Show test details |