Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Premium2. Barum Polaris 3 4x4 Lowcost
Comparison: Barum Polaris 3 4x4 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Czech Republic (Barum) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Barum is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Barum (61%). But when it comes to comparing Barum Polaris 3 4x4 and Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Barum Polaris 3 4x4 was done in 2017, compared to 2015 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Barum Polaris 3 4x4 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo also have C wet ratings.
| # | Barum Polaris 3 4x4
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Barum Polaris 3 4x4 Satisfactory2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Still recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Barum Polaris 3 4x4 Satisfactory2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Still recommended
