Segment
1. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Lowcost2. Westlake Z-107 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Czech Republic (Barum) against a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Westlake). Barum is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Barum summer tyres are slightly better rated (39%) than Westlake (22%). In this particular case, the Barum Bravuris 5 HM has a better rating of 39% compared to 3% of the Westlake Z-107. The first tyre test of Barum Bravuris 5 HM was done in 2020, compared to 2023 when was the Westlake Z-107 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the Bravuris 5 HM and the Z-107 were tested.
# | Barum Bravuris 5 HM
| Westlake Z-107
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R21 | ||
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Lowcost2. Westlake Z-107 Lowcost
1. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 26.38
2. Westlake Z-107 Sufficient
1. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Conditionally recommended2. Westlake Z-107 Sufficient
Name | Rating | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | dobré | 1,3 | 1,8 | ||||
Barum Bravuris 5 HM Rating: Good | chvalitebné | 2,9 | 3,2 | ||||
Westlake Z-107 Rating: Sufficient | dostatečné | 3,7 | 2,7 | ||||
Show test details |