Segment
1. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Upper-middle2. Barum Bravuris 3 HM Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Czech Republic (Barum) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Barum is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Yokohama summer tyres are slightly better rated (42%) than Barum (39%). But when it comes to comparing Barum Bravuris 3 HM and Yokohama Advan Fleva V701, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Barum Bravuris 3 HM was done in 2016, compared to 2017 when was the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the Bravuris 3 HM and the Advan Fleva V701 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Barum Bravuris 3 HM has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 has A rating.
# | Barum Bravuris 3 HM
| Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R15 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Upper-middle2. Barum Bravuris 3 HM Lowcost
2. Barum Bravuris 3 HM 23.75
1. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Satisfactory2. Barum Bravuris 3 HM Satisfactory
1. Barum Bravuris 3 HM Satisfactory2. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Conditionally recommended
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
Barum Bravuris 3 HM | 38,7 | 34,5 | |||||
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 | 35,2 | 32,9 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
Barum Bravuris 3 HM | 37,6 | 42,1 | |||||
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 | 34,9 | 40,2 | |||||
Show test details |