Segment
1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Upper-middle2. Avon ZV7 Lowcost
Comparison: Avon ZV7 vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Table of contents:
| # | Avon ZV7
| Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R14 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
When it comes to comparing the Avon ZV7 and the Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun tyres, important factors such as performance, durability, and efficiency need to be considered. Both are summer tyres, however, according to our ratings the Falken tyre holds a significant lead with a rating of 81% compared to Avon's 48%. This is a good indicator of its superior overall performance.
The Avon ZV7, produced by Avon, has not been replaced by a newer model and has notably been relatively economical in terms of usage. However, it's important to highlight, that according to the autobild 2019 test, the Avon ZV7 demonstrated weaknesses on dry roads, poor environmental balance, very low mileage, much wear, and weaknesses in sustainability.
On the other hand, Falken's ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun, which is a touring summer tyre made in Turkey by Falken, also has been not replaced by another model. It performs excellently on both wet and dry roads, showing a well-balanced behaviour, noted by autobild 2019. Nevertheless, it also revealed weak points like minor deficiencies in environmental balance, efficiency, and sustainability.
During the mutual tests carried out, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun consistently outperformed the Avon ZV7. For example, in the ADAC test, Falken was positioned 6th out of 50, whereas Avon took the 42nd spot. Similarly, in the Autobild test, Falken again ranked 6th, while Avon came in at 16th out of 51. These results further demonstrate that the Falken tyre generally tends to perform better in comparable situations.
Conclusion: It's clear that the Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun stands out as the superior tyre between these two, with better performance on both wet and dry terrains, despite some deficiencies in environmental balance and efficiency. Meanwhile, the Avon ZV7 could be considered a more economical option, but it falls short in terms of performance and durability when compared to Falken.
Number of sizes available
2. Avon ZV7 58
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Avon ZV7 8.
Worst position in test
2. Avon ZV7 42.
Average position in tests
2. Avon ZV7 18.55
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Exemplary2. Avon ZV7 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Still recommended2. Avon ZV7 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
2. Avon ZV7 75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Avon ZV7 89%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
2. Avon ZV7 55%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Avon ZV7 72%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Avon ZV7 Rating: Sufficient | 4,1 | 3,9 | |||||
| Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Rating: Good | 2,7 | 2,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Avon ZV7 | 37,9 | 34,3 | |||||
| Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun | 35,8 | 31,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Avon ZV7 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2- | 3+ | ||||
| Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Avon ZV7 | 38,3 | 38,2 | |||||
| Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun | 36,7 | 35,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
