Comparison: Austone SP901 vs. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Austone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT). Generally, GT winter tyres are slightly better rated (37%) than Austone (6%). In this particular case, the GT Radial Champiro WinterPro 2 has a better rating of 55% compared to 5% of the Austone SP901. The first tyre test of Austone SP901 was done in 2022, compared to 2021 when was the GT Radial Champiro WinterPro 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the SP901 and the Radial Champiro WinterPro 2 were tested.
| # | Austone SP901
| GT Radial Champiro WinterPro 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R13 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
2. Austone SP901 52.
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
2. Austone SP901 46%
Wet handling
2. Austone SP901 30%
Wet braking
2. Austone SP901 27%
Aquaplaning - cross
2. Austone SP901 38%
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
1. Austone SP901 88%
Snow traction
1. Austone SP901 84%
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Austone SP901 78%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
2. Austone SP901 60%
Dry handling
2. Austone SP901 33%
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
1. Austone SP901 78%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
| Austone SP901 | 41,2 | ||||||
| GT Radial Champiro WinterPro 2 | 37,3 | 26,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
