14 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Apollo Aspire XP Winter vs. Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Costs
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). The first tyre test of Apollo Aspire XP Winter was done in 2019, compared to 2015 when was the Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S first tested.

#	Apollo Aspire XP Winter /50%	Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S /0%

Dimensions	R16 - R18	R15 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S Premium

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S 78

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 20

Number of tests

1. Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S 12x

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 6x

Best position in test

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 1.

2. Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S 4.

Worst position in test

1. Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S 27.

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 30.

Average position in tests

1. Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S 8.58

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 11.17

Year of the last test

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 2023

2. Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S 2017

Best rating in test

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter Exemplary

2. Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter Good

2. Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Apollo
Aspire XP Winter

82%

Vredestein
Wintrac Xtreme S

0%

Wet braking

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 75%

2. Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S 0%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 84%

2. Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S 0%

Wet circle cornering

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 83%

2. Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S 0%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 86%

2. Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S 0%

Wet handling

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 81%

2. Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S 0%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter ?

2. Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Apollo
Aspire XP Winter

77%

Vredestein
Wintrac Xtreme S

0%

Snow braking

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 79%

2. Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S 0%

Snow traction

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 82%

2. Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S 0%

Snow cornering

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 72%

2. Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S 0%

Snow handling

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 77%

2. Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S 0%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Apollo
Aspire XP Winter

80%

Vredestein
Wintrac Xtreme S

0%

Rolling resistance

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 80%

2. Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S 0%

Mileage

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 77%

2. Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S 0%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter ?

2. Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Apollo
Aspire XP Winter

86%

Vredestein
Wintrac Xtreme S

0%

Dry braking

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 82%

2. Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S 0%

Dry handling

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 89%

2. Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S 0%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Apollo
Aspire XP Winter

79%

Vredestein
Wintrac Xtreme S

0%

Exterior noise

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 76%

2. Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S 0%

Comfort

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 82%

2. Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter ?

2. Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Comparison: Apollo Aspire XP Winter vs. Vredestein Wintrac Xtreme S

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands