Comparison: Apollo Aspire XP Winter vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Kleber). Kleber is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Kleber winter tyres are slightly better rated (73%) than Apollo (71%). In this particular case, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 has a better rating of 87% compared to 50% of the Apollo Aspire XP Winter. The first tyre test of Apollo Aspire XP Winter was done in 2019, compared to 2022 when was the Kleber Quadraxer 3 first tested.

#	Apollo Aspire XP Winter /50%	Kleber Quadraxer 3 /87%	Add to comparison Make Model New comparison

Dimensions	R16 - R18	R14 - R20
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Apollo Aspire XP Winter

/50%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

/87%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

New comparison

Dimensions

R16 - R18

R14 - R20

Price

Set dimension to see prices

Remove

Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 109

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 20

Number of tests

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 6x

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 6x

Best position in test

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 1.

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 4.

Worst position in test

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 8.

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 30.

Average position in tests

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 5.33

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 11.17

Year of the last test

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 2024

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 2023

Best rating in test

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter Exemplary

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Highly recommended

Worst rating in test

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Good

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter Good

Wet

(Overall rating)

Apollo
Aspire XP Winter

82%

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

75%

Wet braking

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 75%

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 73%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 84%

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 82%

Wet circle cornering

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 83%

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 74%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 86%

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 81%

Wet handling

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 81%

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 64%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter ?

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

86%

Apollo
Aspire XP Winter

77%

Snow braking

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 85%

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 79%

Snow traction

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 86%

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 82%

Snow cornering

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 85%

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 72%

Snow handling

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 88%

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 77%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Apollo
Aspire XP Winter

80%

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

70%

Rolling resistance

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 80%

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 80%

Mileage

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 77%

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 62%

Price/value

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 83%

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 66%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter ?

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Apollo
Aspire XP Winter

86%

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

80%

Dry braking

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 86%

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 82%

Dry handling

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 89%

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 74%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

86%

Apollo
Aspire XP Winter

79%

Exterior noise

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 80%

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 76%

Comfort

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 91%

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 82%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 ?

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter ?

Add to comparison

Comparison: Apollo Aspire XP Winter vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands