14 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Apollo Aspire XP Winter vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Apollo (71%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has a better rating of 88% compared to 45% of the Apollo Aspire XP Winter. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 225/45 R17 test, where both the Aspire XP Winter and the Blizzak LM-005 were tested. See more mutual tests below.

#	Apollo Aspire XP Winter /45%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /88%

Dimensions	R16 - R18	R14 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter ?

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 20

Number of tests

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter ?

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

Best position in test

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter ?

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

Worst position in test

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter ?

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

Average position in tests

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter ?

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

Year of the last test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 2023

Best rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter ?

Worst rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter ?

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

88%

Apollo
Aspire XP Winter

79%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 93%

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 72%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 83%

Wet circle cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 93%

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 79%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 86%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

Wet handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 78%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82%

Apollo
Aspire XP Winter

74%

Snow traction

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 77%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 77%

Snow braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 85%

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 75%

Snow cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 69%

Snow handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 76%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Apollo
Aspire XP Winter

79%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

74%

Rolling resistance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 88%

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 78%

Mileage

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 77%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 67%

Price/value

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 83%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 66%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

85%

Apollo
Aspire XP Winter

85%

Dry braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 80%

Dry handling

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 90%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

83%

Apollo
Aspire XP Winter

76%

Comfort

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 80%

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 80%

Exterior noise

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 85%

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 73%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

ADAC Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R17

Name	Enviromental impact	Driving safety
Best values in test	1,8	2,0
Apollo Aspire XP Winter Rating: Satisfactory	2,6	2,9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory	3,1	3,2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	31,4	29,2
Apollo Aspire XP Winter	37,2	33,0
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	31,4	30,9
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	1-	2+	1-
Apollo Aspire XP Winter Rating: Good	2	2+	2	2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2+	1-	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	30,3	24,3
Apollo Aspire XP Winter	35,1	25,3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	30,3	24,5
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 215/60 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	2+	2	1
Apollo Aspire XP Winter Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	1-
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	2+	2	1
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Apollo Aspire XP Winter Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	2	1-
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary	1-	2	2	2
Show test details

Comparison: Apollo Aspire XP Winter vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands