Segment
1. Vredestein ULTRAC Premium2. Apollo Aspire 4G Lowcost
Comparison: Apollo Aspire 4G vs. Vredestein ULTRAC
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Vredestein summer tyres are slightly better rated (55%) than Apollo (43%). In this particular case, the Apollo Aspire 4G has a better rating of 35% compared to 21% of the Vredestein ULTRAC . The first tyre test of Apollo Aspire 4G was done in 2017, compared to 2022 when was the Vredestein ULTRAC first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Aspire 4G and the ULTRAC were tested.
| # | Apollo Aspire 4G
| Vredestein ULTRAC
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Vredestein ULTRAC 7.252. Apollo Aspire 4G 25.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein ULTRAC Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Vredestein ULTRAC Sufficient
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Apollo Aspire 4G | 37,6 | 30,7 | |||||
| Vredestein ULTRAC | 36,1 | 26,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
