Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Premium2. Apollo Aspire 4G Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (88%) than Apollo (43%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Turanza 6 has a better rating of 83% compared to 40% of the Apollo Aspire 4G. The first tyre test of Apollo Aspire 4G was done in 2017, compared to 2023 when was the Bridgestone Turanza 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Aspire 4G and the Turanza 6 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Apollo Aspire 4G
| Bridgestone Turanza 6
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R16 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Premium2. Apollo Aspire 4G Lowcost
2. Apollo Aspire 4G 25.33
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Exemplary
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
Apollo Aspire 4G | 37,6 | 30,7 | |||||
Bridgestone Turanza 6 | 36,9 | 27,9 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
Apollo Aspire 4G | 67.7 | 29.8 | |||||
Bridgestone Turanza 6 | 63.8 | 27.6 | |||||
Show test details |