Segment
1. Kumho Crugen HP91 Upper-middle2. Apollo Apterra H/T2 Lowcost
Comparison: Apollo Apterra H/T2 vs. Kumho Crugen HP91
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Apollo (43%). But when it comes to comparing Apollo Apterra H/T2 and Kumho Crugen HP91, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Apollo Apterra H/T2 was done in 2018, compared to 2017 when was the Kumho Crugen HP91 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 265/60 R18 test, where both the Apterra H/T2 and the Crugen HP91 were tested.
| # | Apollo Apterra H/T2
| Kumho Crugen HP91
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R18 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory2. Apollo Apterra H/T2 Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory2. Apollo Apterra H/T2 Conditionally recommended
Offroad
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | ||||||
| Apollo Apterra H/T2 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | ||||||
| Kumho Crugen HP91 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
