Segment
1. Vredestein T-Trac 2 Premium2. Apollo Amazer 4G ECO Lowcost
Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. Vredestein T-Trac 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Vredestein summer tyres are slightly better rated (55%) than Apollo (43%). But when it comes to comparing Apollo Amazer 4G ECO and Vredestein T-Trac 2, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2018 175/65 R14 test, where both the Amazer 4G ECO and the T-Trac 2 were tested.
| # | Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
| Vredestein T-Trac 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R15 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Apollo Amazer 4G ECO Satisfactory2. Vredestein T-Trac 2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Apollo Amazer 4G ECO Satisfactory2. Vredestein T-Trac 2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,9 | 1,5 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 1,6 | |
| Apollo Amazer 4G ECO Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,9 | 1,8 | 3,5 | 2,5 | 1,6 | |
| Vredestein T-Trac 2 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,8 | 2,5 | 3,8 | 2,0 | 1,8 | |
| Show test details | |||||||