Segment
1. Kumho PorTran KC53 Upper-middle2. Apollo Altrust Lowcost
Comparison: Apollo Altrust vs. Kumho PorTran KC53
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Apollo (43%). But when it comes to comparing Apollo Altrust and Kumho PorTran KC53, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 215/65 R16 test, where both the Altrust and the PorTran KC53 were tested.
| # | Apollo Altrust
| Kumho PorTran KC53
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R16 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Apollo Altrust Satisfactory2. Kumho PorTran KC53 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Apollo Altrust Satisfactory2. Kumho PorTran KC53 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | uspokojivé | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 0,5 | 1,7 | |
| Apollo Altrust Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 2,4 | |
| Kumho PorTran KC53 Rating: Sufficient | dostatečné | 3,8 | 3,2 | 2,7 | 2,0 | 2,0 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
