Segment
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Lowcost2. Tristar Snowpower HP Lowcost
Comparison: Apollo Alnac 4G vs. Tristar Snowpower HP
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Tristar). Generally, Apollo summer tyres are slightly better rated (43%) than Tristar (42%). The first tyre test of Apollo Alnac 4G was done in 2015, compared to 2018 when was the Tristar Snowpower HP first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 205/55 R16 test, where both the Alnac 4G and the Snowpower HP were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Apollo Alnac 4G
| Tristar Snowpower HP
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R12 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Apollo Alnac 4G 18.88
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 27,3 | |||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G | 38 | 29,5 | |||||
| Tristar Snowpower HP | 43,2 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G | 37,8 | 28,7 | |||||
| Tristar Snowpower HP | 42 | - | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
