Segment
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Lowcost2. Riken Road Performance Lowcost
Comparison: Apollo Alnac 4G vs. Riken Road Performance
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Riken). Generally, Apollo summer tyres are slightly better rated (43%) than Riken (9%). The first tyre test of Apollo Alnac 4G was done in 2015, compared to 2021 when was the Riken Road Performance first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the Alnac 4G and the Road Performance were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Apollo Alnac 4G
| Riken Road Performance
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R15 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Apollo Alnac 4G 18.88
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,3 | 1,8 | ||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G Rating: Good | chvalitebné | 3,5 | 3,0 | ||||
| Riken Road Performance Rating: Poor | nedostatečné | 3,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G | 36,8 | 33,2 | |||||
| Riken Road Performance | 37,8 | 39,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
