Segment
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Lowcost2. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 Lowcost
Comparison: Apollo Alnac 4G vs. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Laufenn). Generally, Laufenn summer tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than Apollo (43%). In this particular case, the Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 has a better rating of 52% compared to 46% of the Apollo Alnac 4G. The first tyre test of Apollo Alnac 4G was done in 2015, compared to 2021 when was the Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the Alnac 4G and the S Fit EQ+ LK01 were tested.
| # | Apollo Alnac 4G
| Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Apollo Alnac 4G 18.88
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Exemplary2. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Satisfactory2. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,3 | 1,8 | ||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G Rating: Good | chvalitebné | 3,5 | 3,0 | ||||
| Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 Rating: Sufficient | dostatečné | 3,9 | 2,9 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
