Segment
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Lowcost2. Gt Radial Fe2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (Gt). Generally, Gt summer tyres are slightly better rated (51%) than Apollo (43%). The first tyre test of Apollo Alnac 4G was done in 2015, compared to 2023 when was the Gt Radial Fe2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the Alnac 4G and the Radial Fe2 were tested.
# | Apollo Alnac 4G
| Gt Radial Fe2
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R18 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Lowcost2. Gt Radial Fe2 Lowcost
2. Gt Radial Fe2 11.
1. Gt Radial Fe2 22.
1. Gt Radial Fe2 16.52. Apollo Alnac 4G 18.88
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Exemplary2. Gt Radial Fe2 Good
1. Gt Radial Fe2 Good2. Apollo Alnac 4G Satisfactory
1. Gt Radial Fe2 74%
2. Gt Radial Fe2 75%
2. Gt Radial Fe2 69%
2. Gt Radial Fe2 79%
1. Gt Radial Fe2 80%
1. Gt Radial Fe2 80%
1. Gt Radial Fe2 71%
2. Gt Radial Fe2 74%
2. Gt Radial Fe2 79%
1. Gt Radial Fe2 72%
1. Gt Radial Fe2 65%
Name | Rating | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | dobré | 1,3 | 1,8 | ||||
Apollo Alnac 4G Rating: Good | chvalitebné | 3,5 | 3,0 | ||||
Gt Radial Fe2 Rating: Good | chvalitebné | 3,0 | 2,9 | ||||
Show test details |