Segment
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Lowcost2. GT Radial Champiro FE1 Lowcost
Comparison: Apollo Alnac 4G vs. GT Radial Champiro FE1
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT). Generally, GT summer tyres are slightly better rated (51%) than Apollo (43%). The first tyre test of Apollo Alnac 4G was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the GT Radial Champiro FE1 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 205/55 R16 test, where both the Alnac 4G and the Radial Champiro FE1 were tested.
| # | Apollo Alnac 4G
| GT Radial Champiro FE1
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R15 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Apollo Alnac 4G 18.88
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Exemplary2. GT Radial Champiro FE1 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Satisfactory2. GT Radial Champiro FE1 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G | 36,8 | 33,2 | |||||
| GT Radial Champiro FE1 | 38,0 | 36,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
