14 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: tyres similar to Yokohama W.drive V905

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

Looking for a comparison of Yokohama W.drive V905 to tyres that are made in similar dimensions? Here you can find detailed information based on tests, reviews and manufacturer's data.

#	Yokohama W.drive V905 /0%	Uniroyal MS plus 77 /55%	Falken EuroWinter HS01 /61%	Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P /53%	Kleber KRISALP HP3 /73%	Fulda Kristall Control HP2 /59%	Barum Polaris 5 /63%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /84%	Continental WinterContact TS 850P SUV /74%

Dimensions	R16 - R19	R13 - R19	R13 - R21	R16 - R22	R14 - R20	R15 - R19	R13 - R19	R14 - R19	R15 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove

Segment

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Premium

2. Continental WinterContact TS 850P SUV Premium

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle

5. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle

6. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Upper-middle

7. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

8. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost

9. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Continental WinterContact TS 850P SUV 194

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 166

3. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 114

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 107

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

6. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76

7. Barum Polaris 5 74

8. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 51

9. Yokohama W.drive V905 8

Number of tests

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 23x

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 23x

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 20x

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 19x

5. Uniroyal MS plus 77 19x

6. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 16x

7. Barum Polaris 5 11x

8. Yokohama W.drive V905 10x

9. Continental WinterContact TS 850P SUV 9x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 850P SUV 1.

3. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 1.

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 2.

5. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 2.

6. Uniroyal MS plus 77 3.

7. Falken EuroWinter HS01 5.

8. Yokohama W.drive V905 7.

9. Barum Polaris 5 9.

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 850P SUV 7.

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 11.

3. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 12.

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 16.

5. Uniroyal MS plus 77 17.

6. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 23.

7. Yokohama W.drive V905 24.

8. Barum Polaris 5 26.

9. Falken EuroWinter HS01 30.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 850P SUV 3.22

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 3.56

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 5.63

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 7.3

5. Falken EuroWinter HS01 11.04

6. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 11.05

7. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.21

8. Yokohama W.drive V905 14

9. Barum Polaris 5 14.82

Year of the last test

1. Barum Polaris 5 2023

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2023

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 2023

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 2023

5. Falken EuroWinter HS01 2022

6. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 2021

7. Continental WinterContact TS 850P SUV 2021

8. Uniroyal MS plus 77 2020

9. Yokohama W.drive V905 2019

Best rating in test

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Exemplary

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Exemplary

3. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Exemplary

4. Continental WinterContact TS 850P SUV Highly recommended

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

6. Barum Polaris 5 Good

7. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

8. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactory

9. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Good

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

3. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Recommended

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

5. Continental WinterContact TS 850P SUV Satisfactory

6. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Satisfactory

7. Yokohama W.drive V905 Conditionally recommended

8. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient

9. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Sufficient

Wet

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

87%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

86%

Continental
WinterContact TS 850P SUV

85.1%

Continental
ContiWinterContact TS 850P

81.2%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

80%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

78%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

76.2%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

63%

Barum
Polaris 5

61.8%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 B

3. Continental WinterContact TS 850P SUV C

4. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P C

5. Barum Polaris 5 C

6. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

7. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

8. Falken EuroWinter HS01 ?

9. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

92%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

92%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

84%

Continental
WinterContact TS 850P SUV

82.2%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

80%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

79%

Barum
Polaris 5

76.1%

Continental
ContiWinterContact TS 850P

75.8%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

72.2%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 850P SUV

87%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

83%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

80%

Continental
ContiWinterContact TS 850P

80.7%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

77%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

77%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

75%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

72.2%

Barum
Polaris 5

70.5%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 850P SUV

89.9%

Continental
ContiWinterContact TS 850P

83.8%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

81%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

81%

Barum
Polaris 5

79.8%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

78%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

78%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

77%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

61.4%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 850P SUV C

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P C

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 C

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

5. Barum Polaris 5 E

6. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

7. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

8. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

9. Falken EuroWinter HS01 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

90%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

87%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

87%

Continental
ContiWinterContact TS 850P

79.8%

Continental
WinterContact TS 850P SUV

77.5%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

75.6%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

73%

Barum
Polaris 5

73.3%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

63%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 72 dB

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 72 dB

3. Continental WinterContact TS 850P SUV 72 dB

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

5. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

6. Falken EuroWinter HS01 ?

7. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

8. Barum Polaris 5 ?

9. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

83%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

83.5%

Barum
Polaris 5

82%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

77%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

75.8%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

69%

Continental
ContiWinterContact TS 850P

0%

Continental
WinterContact TS 850P SUV

0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Rating	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	příkladné	2+	2+	1	2+
Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: Good	dobré	2-	2-	2-	2
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Good	dobré	2	2-	2+	2-
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Satisfactory	uspokojivé	2+	3+	1-	2-
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Good	dobré	2-	2-	2+	2-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	dobré	2+	2-	1-	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,3	27
Yokohama W.drive V905	36,6	29,5
Uniroyal MS plus 77	36,1	27,9
Falken EuroWinter HS01	36,2	28
Kleber KRISALP HP3	35,9	27,1
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	34,8	27,6
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Rating	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	příkladné	2+	2+	1	2+
Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: Satisfactory	uspokojivé	2-	2-	2	2-
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory	uspokojivé	2-	2-	2	2+
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Good	dobré	2	2-	1-	2
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Good	dobré	2	2	2+	1-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	dobré	2	2-	1	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Yokohama W.drive V905	34,7	28,3
Uniroyal MS plus 77	36	28,1
Kleber KRISALP HP3	35,7	26,7
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	35,5	28,1
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,1	25,9
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,2	25
Yokohama W.drive V905	39,9	26,9
Uniroyal MS plus 77	39,1	25,7
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2016 225/45 R17

Name	Rating	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	Dobré	2,3	2,1	1,7	2,0	2,8	1,5	1,5
Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: -	Uspokojivé	3,3	2,5	2,1	2,9	4,0	3,5	2,4
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: -	Uspokojivé	2,3	3,2	2,5	2,6	3,1	2,5	1,9
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2015 185/60 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	36,8	27,7
Yokohama W.drive V905	42,6	29,4
Uniroyal MS plus 77	41,7	28,6
Show test details

Comparison: tyres similar to Yokohama W.drive V905

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands