• 14 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: tyres similar to Firestone Multiseason 2

Looking for a comparison of Firestone Multiseason 2 to tyres that are made in similar dimensions? Here you can find detailed information based on tests, reviews and manufacturer's data.

# Firestone Multiseason 2
/60%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
/67%
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
/71%
Michelin CrossClimate+
/75%
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
/85%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
/93%
Hankook Kinergy 4S H740
/0%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
/89%
Vredestein Quatrac
/88%

Add to comparison

Firestone
Kumho
Bridgestone
Michelin
Continental
Michelin
Hankook
Hankook
Vredestein
DimensionsR13 - R19 R13 - R20 R15 - R21 R13 - R19 R15 - R21 R15 - R21 R13 - R18 R14 - R20 R15 - R17
Price
Remove



The Firestone Multiseason 2 and the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S are two tyres that have been tested extensively for their performance under various conditions. We will compare these two models and share with you the strengths and weaknesses of each.


The Firestone Multiseason 2 is a winter tyre made in Italy. It scored a 67% in our test and notably offers short braking distances on snow and in wet conditions, high mileage and low rolling resistance which were its best features in Autobild's tests. However, it falls behind in terms of snow cornering grip, reserve in curve aquaplaning and has an extended dry braking distance. Although it finished 6th in the Autobild test (out of 32), these are areas where there is potential for improvement. More about Firestone tyres here.


On the other hand, the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S which is an allround tyre made in China, has a higher overall rating of 73% in our test. Best features such as low exterior noise, snow traction and braking, and value for money helped this tyre secure the 10th position in the Autobild test. However, it does have a downside such as mediocre aquaplaning characteristics and being subject to slightly extended braking distances on both dry and wet conditions, alongside a higher rolling resistance. More about Kumho tyres here.


In a head-to-head comparison, the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S seems to perform better overall in the tests. While the Firestone Multiseason 2 does have compelling features like the ability to provide a high mileage and a good price/value ratio, it's the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S' better overall performance and lower noise levels that gives it an edge. However, it's important to choose a tyre that meets your specific needs and driving conditions.


In conclusion, both tyres have their strengths and weaknesses, and the selection should be based on specific preferences and needs. Some may prioritize noise levels while others may focus more on snow traction or the longevity of the tyre.

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test37.745
Firestone Multiseason 241.847.9
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S41.449.8
Continental AllSeasonContact 240.445.4
Michelin CrossClimate 237.7 47
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H75041.349.5
Vredestein Quatrac40.345.4
Show test details
Autobild
Name Rating
Best values in testpříkladné
Firestone Multiseason 2
Rating: Satisfactory
uspokojivé
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
Rating: Satisfactory
uspokojivé
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
Rating: Exemplary
příkladné
Michelin CrossClimate 2
Rating: Exemplary
příkladné
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Rating: Good
dobré
Vredestein Quatrac
Rating: Exemplary
příkladné
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test39,944,4
Firestone Multiseason 245,948,9
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S44,451,9
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO41,444,4
Michelin CrossClimate 239,9 49,2
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H75042,148
Vredestein Quatrac41,747,1
Show test details
Autobild
Name RatingWetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in testuspokojivé1-2+1-1
Firestone Multiseason 2
Rating: Satisfactory
uspokojivé 23+22+
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
Rating: Good
dobré2-2-2+2+
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
Rating: Conditionally recommended
podmíněně doporučeno2+232-
Michelin CrossClimate 2
Rating: Satisfactory
uspokojivé 2-2+ 1- 3
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Rating: Good
dobré22+ 1- 3+
Vredestein Quatrac
Rating: Satisfactory
uspokojivé 2+22+2-
Show test details
Autobild
Name RatingWetDrySnowRolling resistanceWear
Best values in testvítěz testu2+1-2+11
Firestone Multiseason 2
Rating: Satisfactory
uspokojivé3+2-2+ 22
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
Rating: Satisfactory
uspokojivé3+2221
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
Rating: Satisfactory
uspokojivé22+223+
Michelin CrossClimate 2
Rating: Satisfactory
uspokojivé2-1- 2+ 1 2-
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Rating: Good
dobré22223
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test37,650
Firestone Multiseason 242,454,1
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S41,554,4
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO41,452,9
Michelin CrossClimate 237,6 53,9
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H75040,352,3
Show test details
Autobild
Name RatingWetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in testvítěz testu12+11
Firestone Multiseason 2
Rating: Good
dobré22+ 2+1
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
Rating: Satisfactory
uspokojivé222+3
Michelin CrossClimate+
Rating: Exemplary
příkladné21-2+1-
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Rating: Good
dobré1 2+ 2+3+
Vredestein Quatrac
Rating: Exemplary
příkladné1 1-21
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test39,745
Firestone Multiseason 241,249,3
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S44,349,3
Michelin CrossClimate+39,7 49,7
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H75041,147,2
Vredestein Quatrac40,646,3
Show test details