Table of contents:
205/50 R16 Firestone Roadhawk variants
No
No
Firestone Roadhawk is a summer tyre made in total of 154 sizes, ranging from R15 to R15 - this particular dimension is R16, which means it fits to a 16 inch/406.4mm diameter wheel. 205/50 R16 is 40mm wider than the narrowest dimension (165) and 90mm narrower than the widest one (295). This tyre profile of 50 means the sidewall height of the tyre is 50% of the tyre width (205mm), which results in 102.5mm sidewall height. In 205/50 R16, there are 2 possible speed indexes for Firestone Roadhawk - "V","W", which are good for speeds up to 240, 270 km/h. In 205/50 R16, Roadhawk usually competes against RainSport 5, which is a tyre from Uniroyal with a rating of 62%, compared to 57% of the Firestone in question.
205/50 R16 87 V
A
C
71dB
Firestone Roadhawk is made in 154 sizes, starting from 165/65 R15 up to 295/35 R21.
Similar tires
Firestone Roadhawk in tyre tests
Relevant tyre tests in same or similiar dimension (205/50 R16)
Autobild Summer tyre test 2024 205/55 R16
good
Ranked #6 of 20
Securing the 6th position out of 20 participants, the Firestone Roadhawk made a notable impact with its performance, being awarded a final rating of 'Good'. The tire was celebrated for its brand quality, sporting a dynamic handling that impressed, alongside its short braking distances on dry surfaces which underscored its efficiency. Its value for money was another highlight, offering a budget-friendly option without compromising on performance. However, it wasn't without its shortcomings; the tire was marked down for its increased rolling noise, a factor that could affect overall driving comfort. Despite this critique, the Firestone Roadhawk demonstrated commendable qualities, positioning it as a competitive choice for drivers seeking reliable performance.
good
Ranked #6 of 20
Securing the 6th position out of 20 participants, the Firestone Roadhawk made a notable impact with its performance, being awarded a final rating of 'Good'. The tire was celebrated for its brand quality, sporting a dynamic handling that impressed, alongside its short braking distances on dry surfaces which underscored its efficiency. Its value for money was another highlight, offering a budget-friendly option without compromising on performance. However, it wasn't without its shortcomings; the tire was marked down for its increased rolling noise, a factor that could affect overall driving comfort. Despite this critique, the Firestone Roadhawk demonstrated commendable qualities, positioning it as a competitive choice for drivers seeking reliable performance.
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Firestone Roadhawk | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 36,6 | 28,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 104,7 | 106 | 103,4 | ||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
ADAC Summer tyre test 2023 205/55 R16
good
Ranked #20 of 50
Finishing 20 out of 50 competitors, the Firestone Roadhawk demonstrated a commendable performance in the summer evaluation. Earning a final rating of 'Good', it stood out for its excellent handling on dry roads, lightweight and efficient nature, and minimal tyre wear, making it a strong choice for drivers prioritizing these factors. However, its performance was not without drawbacks; it was criticized for its imbalance and notably inferior wet road handling, which ultimately affected its overall score. The tyre's safety on wet surfaces was only deemed satisfactory, with shortcomings in aquaplaning resistance and braking distances. Despite performing well in certain tests like aquaplaning, it struggled to provide the same level of grip and handling in wet conditions, leading to a satisfactory evaluation in this area. Additionally, its environmental impact was somewhat marred by its predicted mileage being rated only satisfactory. This was attributed to its performance in road wear and fuel consumption, which, despite being considered good, did not compensate for the lower score in tyre longevity.
good
Ranked #20 of 50
Finishing 20 out of 50 competitors, the Firestone Roadhawk demonstrated a commendable performance in the summer evaluation. Earning a final rating of 'Good', it stood out for its excellent handling on dry roads, lightweight and efficient nature, and minimal tyre wear, making it a strong choice for drivers prioritizing these factors. However, its performance was not without drawbacks; it was criticized for its imbalance and notably inferior wet road handling, which ultimately affected its overall score. The tyre's safety on wet surfaces was only deemed satisfactory, with shortcomings in aquaplaning resistance and braking distances. Despite performing well in certain tests like aquaplaning, it struggled to provide the same level of grip and handling in wet conditions, leading to a satisfactory evaluation in this area. Additionally, its environmental impact was somewhat marred by its predicted mileage being rated only satisfactory. This was attributed to its performance in road wear and fuel consumption, which, despite being considered good, did not compensate for the lower score in tyre longevity.
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 2,7 | 2,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 35,7 | 31,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,6 | 3,0 | 1,0 | 1,7 | ||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 2,2 | 1,7 | 3,7 | 2,5 | 2,2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
