Segment
1. Vredestein ULTRAC Premium2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Upper-middle
Comparison: Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Vredestein summer tyres are slightly better rated (55%) than Yokohama (31%). Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the ULTRAC and the BLUEARTH-GT AE51 were tested. See more mutual tests below. We also know where ULTRAC is made - Hungary.
| # | Vredestein ULTRAC | Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R14 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein ULTRAC Highly recommended2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Vredestein ULTRAC Sufficient2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
2. Vredestein ULTRAC ? dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 146 | 134 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Rating: Highly recommended | 135 | 126 | |||||
| Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Rating: Sufficient | 91 | 113 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac | 36,1 | 28,2 | |||||
| Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 | 37,7 | 32,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||