Segment
1. Vredestein Wintrac Premium2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Sava winter tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Vredestein (53%). In this particular case, the Vredestein Wintrac has a better rating of 78% compared to 75% of the Sava Eskimo HP2. The first tyre test of Sava Eskimo HP2 was done in 2017, compared to 2021 when was the Vredestein Wintrac first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 215/60 R16 test, where both the Eskimo HP2 and the Wintrac were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Sava Eskimo HP2 | Vredestein Wintrac | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R15 - R16 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Vredestein Wintrac Premium2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost
2. Sava Eskimo HP2 14.31
1. Vredestein Wintrac Very good2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory
2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory
1. Sava Eskimo HP2 71 dB
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Rolling resistance | Noise | Wear |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,8 | 1,4 | 1,8 | 1,5 | 2,7 | 1,5 |
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,0 | 2,5 | 2,3 | 2,0 | 1,7 | 3,5 | 1,5 |
Vredestein Wintrac Rating: Satisfactory | 2,3 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 1,8 | 1,6 | 2,7 | 3,0 |
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Wear | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3 | 2- | 2 | 2 | 2+ | ||
Vredestein Wintrac Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 2- | 2+ | 3+ | ||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,1 | 27,3 | |||||
Sava Eskimo HP2 | 36,5 | 28 | |||||
Vredestein Wintrac | 33,5 | 30,3 | |||||
Show test details |