Segment
1. Nokian WR A4 Upper-middle2. Sunny Wintermax NW 211 Lowcost
Comparison: Nokian WR A4 vs. Sunny Wintermax NW 211
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Asia (prob. China) (Sunny). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Sunny (1%). Important for this comparison is also the Sportscars 2017 225/40 R18 test, where both the WR A4 and the Wintermax NW 211 were tested.
| # | Nokian WR A4 | Sunny Wintermax NW 211 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian WR A4 17.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR A4 9.83
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR A4 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR A4 Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Nokian WR A4 64%
Wet braking
1. Nokian WR A4 63%
Wet circle cornering
1. Nokian WR A4 71%
Wet handling
1. Nokian WR A4 65%
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
2. Nokian WR A4 73%
Snow traction
2. Nokian WR A4 79%
Snow braking
2. Nokian WR A4 78%
Snow cornering
2. Nokian WR A4 72%
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
2. Nokian WR A4 89%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Comfort
1. Nokian WR A4 72%
Exterior noise
2. Nokian WR A4 83%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WR A4 72 dB
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
1. Nokian WR A4 81%
Dry handling
1. Nokian WR A4 78%
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Nokian WR A4 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Sunny Wintermax NW 211 Rating: Not recommended | 4- | 3+ | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||