Segment
1. Nokian WR A4 Upper-middle2. Nokian WR C3 Upper-middle
Both of the tyres in this comparison are made by Nokian, which is a brand from Finland. In this particular case, the Nokian WR A4 has a better rating of 47% compared to 27% of the Nokian WR C3. The first tyre test of Nokian WR A4 was done in 2017, compared to 2018 when was the Nokian WR C3 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 94% of Nokian WR A4 has B wet grip rating, whereas 91% of Nokian WR C3 has E rating.
# | Nokian WR A4 | Nokian WR C3 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R14 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian WR A4 Upper-middle2. Nokian WR C3 Upper-middle
2. Nokian WR A4 17.
2. Nokian WR A4 9.83
1. Nokian WR A4 Satisfactory2. Nokian WR C3 Conditionally recommended
1. Nokian WR C3 Conditionally recommended2. Nokian WR A4 Still recommended
1. Nokian WR A4 64%2. Nokian WR C3 33%
1. Nokian WR A4 63%2. Nokian WR C3 25%
1. Nokian WR A4 71%2. Nokian WR C3 33%
1. Nokian WR A4 65%2. Nokian WR C3 33%
1. Nokian WR A4 58%2. Nokian WR C3 25%
1. Nokian WR C3 100%2. Nokian WR A4 73%
1. Nokian WR C3 100%2. Nokian WR A4 79%
1. Nokian WR C3 100%2. Nokian WR A4 78%
1. Nokian WR C3 100%2. Nokian WR A4 72%
1. Nokian WR A4 89%2. Nokian WR C3 43%
1. Nokian WR A4 72%
1. Nokian WR A4 83%2. Nokian WR C3 81%
1. Nokian WR A4 72 dB2. Nokian WR C3 72 dB
1. Nokian WR A4 81%2. Nokian WR C3 62%
1. Nokian WR A4 78%2. Nokian WR C3 53%