Segment
1. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (57%) than Yokohama (31%). The first tyre test of Nokian WetProof was done in 2019, compared to 2022 when was the Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the WetProof and the BLUEARTH-GT AE51 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian WetProof dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (93%) of the Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 also have A wet ratings. We also know where WetProof is made - Finland.
# | Nokian WetProof | Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R14 - R19 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Upper-middle
1. Nokian WetProof 5.64
1. Nokian WetProof Highly recommended2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
1. Nokian WetProof Recommended2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
1. Nokian WetProof 68 dB
Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 146 | 134 | |||||
Nokian Wetproof Rating: Good | 124 | 114 | |||||
Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Rating: Sufficient | 91 | 113 | |||||
Show test details |