• 10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Nokian WetProof vs. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (57%) than Yokohama (31%). The first tyre test of Nokian WetProof was done in 2019, compared to 2022 when was the Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the WetProof and the BLUEARTH-GT AE51 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian WetProof dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (93%) of the Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 also have A wet ratings. We also know where WetProof is made - Finland.

# Nokian WetProof
/83%
Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51
/0%

Add to comparison

DimensionsR14 - R20 R14 - R19
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Name WetDry
Best values in test146134
Nokian Wetproof
Rating: Good
124114
Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51
Rating: Sufficient
91113
Show test details