Segment
1. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle2. Nokian zLine Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian WetProof vs. Nokian zLine
Both of the tyres in this comparison are made by Nokian, which is a brand from Finland. In this particular case, the Nokian WetProof has a better rating of 83% compared to 37% of the Nokian zLine. The first tyre test of Nokian WetProof was done in 2019, compared to 2015 when was the Nokian zLine first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian WetProof dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian zLine also have A wet ratings. We also know where WetProof is made - Finland.
| # | Nokian WetProof | Nokian zLine | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 | | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
2. Nokian zLine 20.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WetProof 5.642. Nokian zLine 7.38
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WetProof Highly recommended2. Nokian zLine Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Nokian WetProof Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
1. Nokian zLine 75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Nokian zLine 83%
Wet braking
1. Nokian zLine 90%
Wet handling
2. Nokian zLine 85%
Wet circle cornering
2. Nokian zLine 60%
Wet side guide
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
2. Nokian zLine 85%
Dry handling
1. Nokian zLine 93%
Dry lane changing
Dry driving behavior
1. Nokian zLine 80%
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Nokian zLine 75%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WetProof 68 dB2. Nokian zLine ? dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
1. Nokian zLine 90%