Segment
1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 Premium2. Nokian WR A4 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (80%) than Nokian (52%). In this particular case, the Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 has a better rating of 100% compared to 47% of the Nokian WR A4. The first tyre test of Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 was done in 2020, compared to 2017 when was the Nokian WR A4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the PILOT ALPIN 5 and the WR A4 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 94% of Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (94%) of the Nokian WR A4 also have B wet ratings. We also know where PILOT ALPIN 5 is made - France.
# | Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 | Nokian WR A4 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R16 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 Premium2. Nokian WR A4 Upper-middle
2. Nokian WR A4 17.
2. Nokian WR A4 9.83
1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 Exemplary2. Nokian WR A4 Satisfactory
2. Nokian WR A4 Still recommended
1. Nokian WR A4 72 dB
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 2+ | 1- | |||
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 1- | 2+ | 1- | |||
Nokian WR A4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 2- | 2 | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 30,3 | 24,3 | |||||
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 | 31,9 | 24,3 | |||||
Nokian WR A4 | 34,6 | 25,5 | |||||
Show test details |