Segment
1. Michelin Latitude Tour HP Premium2. Vredestein Sportrac 5 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (64%) than Vredestein (55%). In this particular case, the Vredestein Sportrac 5 has a better rating of 58% compared to 17% of the Michelin Latitude Tour HP. The first tyre test of Michelin Latitude Tour HP was done in 2017, compared to 2016 when was the Vredestein Sportrac 5 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ACE 2017 215/60 R17 test, where both the Latitude Tour HP and the Sportrac 5 were tested.
# | Michelin Latitude Tour HP | Vredestein Sportrac 5 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R14 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Latitude Tour HP Premium2. Vredestein Sportrac 5 Premium
2. Michelin Latitude Tour HP Conditionally recommended
1. Michelin Latitude Tour HP Sufficient2. Vredestein Sportrac 5 Sufficient
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 153 | 42 | 37 | 14 | 6 | ||
Michelin Latitude Tour HP Rating: Conditionally recommended | 124 | 53 | 37 | 15 | 8 | ||
Vredestein Sportrac 5 Rating: Recommended | 137 | 54 | 47 | 16 | 6 | ||
Show test details |