Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate+ Premium2. Star Performer SPTS AS Lowcost
Comparison: Michelin CrossClimate+ vs. Star Performer SPTS AS
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Star). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (80%) than Star (10%). The first tyre test of Michelin CrossClimate+ was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the Star Performer SPTS AS first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the CrossClimate+ and the Performer SPTS AS were tested.
| # | Michelin CrossClimate+ | Star Performer SPTS AS | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R19 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin CrossClimate+ Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin CrossClimate+ Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow cornering
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,5 | 46,3 | |||||
| Michelin CrossClimate+ | 39,9 | 48,6 | |||||
| Star Performer SPTS AS | 46,1 | 57,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||