Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate+ Premium2. Nokian Seasonproof Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (80%) than Nokian (52%). In this particular case, the Michelin CrossClimate+ has a better rating of 71% compared to 69% of the Nokian Seasonproof. The first tyre test of Michelin CrossClimate+ was done in 2018, compared to 2021 when was the Nokian Seasonproof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 215/60 R16 test, where both the CrossClimate+ and the Seasonproof were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 97% of Michelin CrossClimate+ dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian Seasonproof also have B wet ratings.
# | Michelin CrossClimate+ | Nokian Seasonproof | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R13 - R19 | R14 - R19 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin CrossClimate+ Premium2. Nokian Seasonproof Upper-middle
1. Michelin CrossClimate+ Exemplary2. Nokian Seasonproof Satisfactory
1. Nokian Seasonproof Satisfactory2. Michelin CrossClimate+ Sufficient
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1 | ||||
Michelin CrossClimate+ Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
Nokian Seasonproof Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 1- | ||||
Show test details |