• 10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Michelin Alpin 5 vs. Nokian WR D4

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (80%) than Nokian (52%). In this particular case, the Nokian WR D4 has a better rating of 54% compared to 50% of the Michelin Alpin 5. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the Alpin 5 and the WR D4 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Michelin Alpin 5 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (97%) of the Nokian WR D4 also have B wet ratings.

# Michelin Alpin 5
/50%
Nokian WR D4
/54%

Add to comparison

DimensionsR15 - R21 R13 - R20
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test1-2+11
Michelin Alpin 5
Rating: Satisfactory
223 1
Nokian WR D4
Rating: Satisfactory
3 2-1 2
Show test details
Name WetDrySnowIceNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in test2,12,01,82,33,01,01,7
Michelin Alpin 5
Rating: Satisfactory
2,42,0 2,72,53,61,0 2,4
Nokian WR D4
Rating: Satisfactory
2,92,51,8 2,53,43,01,7
Show test details
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test34,327
Michelin Alpin 537,128,4
Nokian WR D437,327,6
Show test details
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test2+2+11-
Michelin Alpin 5
Rating: Exemplary
2+ 222+
Nokian WR D4
Rating: Satisfactory
22-23+
Show test details
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test32,225,9
Michelin Alpin 533,328,7
Nokian WR D43527,7
Show test details
Name Points total
Best values in test100
Michelin Alpin 597,5
Nokian WR D498
Show test details
Name WetDrySnowIceNoiseFuel consumption
Best values in test2,12,01,92,33,11,4
Michelin Alpin 5
Rating: Satisfactory
2,42,12,72,53,82,3
Nokian WR D4
Rating: Satisfactory
2,62,51,9 2,53,42,52,0
Show test details
Name WetDrySnowIceNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in test1,81,71,72,13,01,51,7
Michelin Alpin 5
Rating: Satisfactory
2,52,13,22,63,51,5 2,6
Nokian WR D4
Rating: Satisfactory
3,12,31,7 2,43,63,01,9
Show test details
Name Points totalWetDrySnowRolling resistanceNoise
Best values in test10096,999,899100100
Michelin Alpin 598,588,29798,888,798,4
Nokian WR D499,796,9 99,599 85,197,9
Show test details
Name Points totalWetDrySnow
Best values in test101100103,3100,3
Michelin Alpin 5
Rating: Very good
100100 100100
Nokian WR D4
Rating: Good
99,397,4100,599,9
Show test details
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test1-22+1
Michelin Alpin 5
Rating: -
2+2 1-2
Nokian WR D4
Rating: -
22- 2+ 2-
Show test details
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test34,225
Michelin Alpin 535,625,8
Nokian WR D437,326,0
Show test details
Name Points totalWetDrySnowRolling resistanceNoise
Best values in test4121421271432510
Michelin Alpin 5
Rating: Highly recommended
376128108140188
Nokian WR D4
Rating: Highly recommended
387124121142218
Show test details
Name Points totalWinterWetDryRolling resistanceNoise
Best values in test205647046188
Michelin Alpin 5
Rating: Recommended
195616741166
Nokian WR D4
Rating: Recommended
19363584518 3
Show test details