Segment
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Premium2. Nokian WR C3 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (80%) than Nokian (52%). In this particular case, the Michelin AGILIS ALPIN has a better rating of 55% compared to 27% of the Nokian WR C3. Important for this comparison is also the ProMobil 2018 225/70 R15 test, where both the AGILIS ALPIN and the WR C3 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Michelin AGILIS ALPIN has B wet grip rating, whereas 91% of Nokian WR C3 has E rating.
# | Michelin AGILIS ALPIN | Nokian WR C3 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Premium2. Nokian WR C3 Upper-middle
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Recommended2. Nokian WR C3 Conditionally recommended
1. Nokian WR C3 Conditionally recommended2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Still recommended
1. Nokian WR C3 62%
2. Nokian WR C3 25%
2. Nokian WR C3 33%
2. Nokian WR C3 33%
2. Nokian WR C3 33%
2. Nokian WR C3 25%
1. Nokian WR C3 100%
1. Nokian WR C3 100%
1. Nokian WR C3 100%
1. Nokian WR C3 81%
2. Nokian WR C3 50%
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 71 dB2. Nokian WR C3 72 dB
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Rating: Still recommended | |||||||
Nokian WR C3 Rating: Conditionally recommended | |||||||
Show test details |