Segment
1. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle2. Laufenn I Fit LW31 Lowcost
Comparison: Laufenn I Fit LW31 vs. Nokian WR D4
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Laufenn) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Laufenn (48%). In this particular case, the Nokian WR D4 has a better rating of 54% compared to 19% of the Laufenn I Fit LW31. The first tyre test of Laufenn I Fit LW31 was done in 2019, compared to 2015 when was the Nokian WR D4 first tested.
| # | Laufenn I Fit LW31 | Nokian WR D4 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R19 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian WR D4 14.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR D4 6.04
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended2. Laufenn I Fit LW31 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Recommended2. Laufenn I Fit LW31 Satisfactory
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
1. Nokian WR D4 81%
Dry driving behavior
2. Nokian WR D4 72%
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
1. Nokian WR D4 91%
Snow handling
1. Nokian WR D4 91%
Snow traction
1. Nokian WR D4 89%
Ice
(Overall rating)Ice braking
1. Nokian WR D4 85%
Ice lateral guidance
1. Nokian WR D4 82%
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
2. Nokian WR D4 67%
Fuel efficiency
2. Nokian WR D4 86%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
1. Nokian WR D4 69%
Interior noise
1. Nokian WR D4 69%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WR D4 ? dB