Segment
1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Upper-middle2. Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03 Lowcost
Comparison: Kumho HA32 Solus 4S vs. Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Rotalla). Generally, Rotalla allround tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Kumho (52%). The first tyre test of Kumho HA32 Solus 4S was done in 2020, compared to 2019 when was the Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 205/55 R16 test, where both the HA32 Solus 4S and the Setula 4 Season RA03 were tested. We also know where HA32 Solus 4S is made - China.
| # | Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R13 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 10.78
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow cornering
Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Price/value
Mileage
Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,7 | 45 | |||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 44,3 | 49,3 | |||||
| Rotalla Setula 4 Season RA03 | 42,9 | 59,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||