Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Premium2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho HA32 Solus 4S vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2
Table of contents:
| # | Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | Michelin CrossClimate 2 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Today we are comparing two highly rated all-round tyres, the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S and the Michelin CrossClimate 2.
Starting with the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S, which is produced by the Kumho company in CN. The tyre is rated 73% by our experts. It has received positive remarks for its exterior noise levels, good snow braking, high mileage and favourable price. Nevertheless, it falls short in the areas of aquaplaning reserves and rolling resistance, resulting in slightly extended wet and dry braking distances. In the Autobild test, it secured 11th position out of 32 tyres tested.
The second tyre we are comparing is the Michelin CrossClimate 2, produced by the Michelin company in IT and ES. This tyre is rated 96% by our experts and has outperformed the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S by securing first position in the Autobild tyre test. The Michelin CrossClimate 2 shines with excellent dry braking, superior snow handling, and considerably lower exterior noise. However, it's worth noting that the higher price is its main drawback.
As both tyres are all-round, their performance on different surfaces is critical. While the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S performs excellently in snow and quiet performance, it struggles with aquaplaning scenarios and has incremented wet and dry braking distances, compromising its performance in slippery conditions. The Michelin CrossClimate 2 on the other hand, has commendable performance on dry and snowy roads, but a higher purchase price might sway budget-conscious buyers.
Although these two tyres both have their respective strengths and weaknesses, it is clear that the Michelin CrossClimate 2 outperforms the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S in overall performance and expert rating. However, the latter offers a valuable alternative for those looking for a robust all-round tyre with less budget.
A careful consideration of your driving conditions and individual requirements should guide your choice between these two quality tyres.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 10.78
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Test winner2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow cornering
Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Price/value
Mileage
Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37.7 | 45 | |||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 41.4 | 49.8 | |||||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 | 37.7 | 47 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,9 | 44,4 | |||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 44,4 | 51,9 | |||||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 | 39,9 | 49,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1- | 1 | |||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Good | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2+ | 1- | 3 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Wear | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 1 | ||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | ||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 2- | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37,6 | 50 | |||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 41,5 | 54,4 | |||||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 | 37,6 | 53,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||