Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle2. Seiberling Touring 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Seiberling Touring 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Seiberling). Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (54%) than Seiberling (1%). The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta PS71 was done in 2018, compared to 2020 when was the Seiberling Touring 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the Ecsta PS71 and the Touring 2 were tested.
| # | Kumho Ecsta PS71 | Seiberling Touring 2 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R13 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 9.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry driving behavior
Offroad
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 ? dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 34,9 | 29 | |||||
| Seiberling Touring 2 | 37 | 37 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||